tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post8261893045929960723..comments2024-03-15T05:40:28.017-07:00Comments on teresamerica: Cop Vs. Obama Poster: Displays FascismTeresahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comBlogger68125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-42201520535502384152016-05-24T14:59:43.691-07:002016-05-24T14:59:43.691-07:00Hello i am Tara Johnson,i live in Lawton U.S.A and...Hello i am Tara Johnson,i live in Lawton U.S.A and i am a single mom,i had financial problem and it was very bad but thank God for this private lender Mrs Shenelle Williams who helped me with a loan of 50,000usd and now we are good all thanks to Mrs Williams.<br />if you know that you are in need of an urgent loan i would advise you to contact Mrs Shenelle Williams at Email:s.williams222@outlook.com<br />Thank You And God Bless.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12110574637504681077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-62174408861743883262009-09-09T16:37:42.820-07:002009-09-09T16:37:42.820-07:00Ron,
You are right. WEll, he is the organizer-in-...Ron,<br /> You are right. WEll, he is the organizer-in-Chief. He is the encourager of getting up in people's faces.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-60708609334453091602009-09-09T16:17:38.195-07:002009-09-09T16:17:38.195-07:00Many far left loons feel they can do anything now ...Many far left loons feel they can do anything now that another far left loon is in the White House. Wonder why???Ron Russellhttp://totus-blog.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-2483245465745503992009-09-02T12:40:59.544-07:002009-09-02T12:40:59.544-07:00Seda,
Clinton was a moderate Democrat and ran hi...Seda,<br /> Clinton was a moderate Democrat and ran his administration just like a Democrat would. The one thing he and Republicans did worthwhile by both having worked together was welfare reform. More people got jobs due to that. All I am saying is that Bush wasn't even half of the cause of the crisis. EVERYONE is to blame-both DEMS and REPUBS alike. But, you seem to be on the blame Republicans bandwagon when in fact the Republicans made many attempts at fixing the housing mess before the crisis started. I'll just say 9/11 was a major contributing factor and one reason there was not the oversight that there should have been by the Bush administration.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-75212923562845122032009-09-02T06:14:46.317-07:002009-09-02T06:14:46.317-07:00Teresa,
Clinton didn't regulate anything becau...Teresa,<br />Clinton didn't regulate anything because he ran things as Republican Lite. His foreign and economic policies were essentially indistinguishable from Reagan's and both Bushes'. Yes, he shares in the fault. But his blunder was in not providing oversight, not making bad loans, which wasn't under his purview. <br /><br />That doesn't change the fact that the GOP was in charge of oversight for at least 7 years before Fannie and Freddie imploded, and that outfits like AIG were corrupt. Nor that Bush was warned in August about an impending attack, and he did nothing.<br /><br />To me, pointing the finger at malfeasance by Democrats doesn't negate malfeasance by Republicans, nor relieve them of their share of the blame. IMHO.Sedahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13992966189983263290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-62046316144188051722009-09-01T06:13:51.154-07:002009-09-01T06:13:51.154-07:00Seda,
If you really want to know what's F&...Seda,<br /> If you really want to know what's F&%$ up is that the Democrats are the party that are a bunch of peace nicks who don't give a rats A$$ about America's defense. Clinton was handed Bin Laden on a silver platter by the Sudanese govt. but he refused. So, if he hadn't been so casual about protecting our country, weakened all of our means of defense while he was humping all those women on the side than maybe 9/11 could have been avoided. Then, Bush and the Republicans could have focused on regulating. They did make some effort even with dealing with 9/11 but you are failing to see reality with those two eyes of yours.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-44791429707167175052009-09-01T06:04:33.465-07:002009-09-01T06:04:33.465-07:00Seda,
Nope. See your being partisan again and fa...Seda,<br /> Nope. See your being partisan again and failing to see the real reason we are in the financial crisis. The housing crisis started this because of Fannie and Freddie. Then, the rest happened like a domino effect because of them. I have a video in an earlier posting showing that Bush and Republicans tried to avert this crisis. How come Clinton didn't regulate anything? In fact he made a huge blunder in the housing market giving the low-income families the same type of grant that was previously set aside for low-income renters. Might have been good in theory but if the person can't pay their bills than the person shouldn't buy a house that they can't afford. Plus, you had ACORN strong arming the banks and forcing them to give out loans and Threatening execs and their families at their homes.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-19479620293681283822009-09-01T05:56:24.376-07:002009-09-01T05:56:24.376-07:00But I guess that's because "the right is ...But I guess that's because "the right is always right." When they f*&% up, it's the left's fault!Sedahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13992966189983263290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-70614279649807116432009-09-01T05:53:57.907-07:002009-09-01T05:53:57.907-07:00Where did you get the idea that the Republicans we...Where did you get the idea that the <i>Republicans</i> were trying to regulate Fannie & Freddie properly? That's one of the quickest revisions of history in history!<br /><br />Oh, wait, never mind - on the very next post you defend Rush. I guess I know where you got it. <br /><br />If you back up over the last 8 years prior to the financial meltdown, you'll find a consistent pattern of deregulation and nonregulation under the Bush administration (the executive branch, remember). That lack of oversight directly enabled the corruption and greed that caused the meltdown. Since Bush was the chief cop overseeing the whole mess, and his administration was notoriously clannish and shut out any liberal voice whatsoever, I have a hard time buying the "It's the Democrats' fault!" line.Sedahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13992966189983263290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-14864980253391704522009-08-31T06:15:02.835-07:002009-08-31T06:15:02.835-07:00are now resolved.Teresa - now the fog is beginning...are now resolved.Teresa - now the fog is beginning to lift. So what you are saying is that you have no objection whatsoever to the fact that certain Presidential appointments are subject to Senate confirmation while others are run-of-the-mill executive appointments. So there is no statutory or constitutinal objection here. Nor is there any objection to 17 of the actual 32 appointments being complained of, since those 17 all went through the Senate confirmation process. So the whole "czar" business seems to be some kind of massive non sequitur that can now be pushed aside. Your complaint is simply that some fraction of 15 executive branch appointments are people you personally believe to be communists, or terrorists, or followers of the principles of National Socialism, or vegetarianism, or whatever. So I think my questions have been resolved.nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-71117806101113503702009-08-31T05:17:12.912-07:002009-08-31T05:17:12.912-07:00Nyp, Its not the number of Czars that is alarming....Nyp, Its not the number of Czars that is alarming. Its most of the persons(czars) are known members of or associated themselves with in the past with shady groups such as: CommunistPartyUSA, WEather Underground and other questionable associations and they would not pass clearance if being vetted, or were an actual appointment being subject to confirmation hearings.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-66745171097354761702009-08-31T05:06:47.608-07:002009-08-31T05:06:47.608-07:00oops - sorry about the math there. It's 6 mor...oops - sorry about the math there. It's 6 more non-confirmatory executive appointments in the current administration than in the previous one, not 7.nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-72605849678824986072009-08-31T05:04:05.566-07:002009-08-31T05:04:05.566-07:00teresa - thanks for the response. But I'm afr...teresa - thanks for the response. But I'm afraid it raises more questions than it answers. <br />1. Is there any specific law that is being broken? Perhaps "Amusing Bunni", who has so little tolerance for dissenting voices, can help us with the research here.<br />2. According to Wikipedia, President Bush had 26 "czars". You say that President Obama has 32. Is it that extra 7 that constitute a threat to our consitutional order?<br />3. You say that of President Obama's 32 "czars," 17 were Senate confirmation positions, and 15 were executive appointments. Does that mean that every Cabinet officer is a "czar"? I've never really thought of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of State as "czars," but then again, I never thought of applying the term to the Third Deputy Presidential Assistant for Wind Turbines as a "czar" either, even though the commentators on this blog seem to do so. <br />Sure would be great if some of your commentators could clear up these questions.nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-74677718738944699272009-08-30T20:28:56.821-07:002009-08-30T20:28:56.821-07:00Nyp,
There are at least 32 Czars under Obama. At...Nyp,<br /> There are at least 32 Czars under Obama. At least 15 czars did not have any confirmation hearings.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-7933785651634410772009-08-30T20:15:37.836-07:002009-08-30T20:15:37.836-07:00Bunni,
Nyp is being civil now, so I don't m...Bunni,<br /> Nyp is being civil now, so I don't mind indulging a little. Thanks for the follow. I will follow you on facebook as well, and hopefully we can become friends on there as well. You are extremely creative and talented. You put those pictures into a video. You did an excellent job. I need to learn how to do that.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-70496788205005534702009-08-30T20:02:21.715-07:002009-08-30T20:02:21.715-07:00Hi Again T, when I saw 52 comments I just had to l...Hi Again T, when I saw 52 comments I just had to look again! Dear Lord, does this "nyp" have anything better to do than take up space? OK, I think we all have been more than patient wasting our time with he/she/it/whatever?? They are positively immune to common sense. That is why O and his evil, criminal minions got in power in the lst place.<br /><br />Not only are lib trolls a mutating disease, their comments are as well. Just an attention getting device, like a whiny, spoiled brat! Now you see why I don't indulge them. It just never ends, they have some personality disorder, in addition to a mental deficiency.<br /><br />I'm glad you took my advice, Teresa. BTW, I got on facebook and the linked blogs thingy and I'm following you & such! Now I must watch your poem video, you're so creative.Amusing Bunnihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385840951446381247noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-21902581207007990802009-08-30T13:30:55.805-07:002009-08-30T13:30:55.805-07:00very odd. So what you meant was this: Submitting ...very odd. So what you meant was this: Submitting a post as "anonymous" is the "gutless" action of a "scared little puppy dog." But forthrightly revealing my identity as "nyp" (or whatever) is completely, totally different. Guess I'll hve to ask the blogging czar to explain it to me.nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-52908682728092092562009-08-30T13:22:14.573-07:002009-08-30T13:22:14.573-07:00Hey Teresa - I took your advice and checked ou tha...Hey Teresa - I took your advice and checked ou that site that you said "has a great deal of information on the 'Czars'" (quotes added.) But unfortunately, it did not answer any of the questions I had posed:<br />a) are any of these positions illegal? Perhaps someone else has a cite to some statute that makes it a crime for a President to appoint an inter-agency coordinator for climate change issues.<br />b) Is this some kind of new practice instituted under the current Administration? From what I can tell, it is pretty common stuff. According to wikipedia, President G.W. Bush has 26 of these fellows, while the current Administration has 31. Is it those extra five guys that poses such a grave threat to our republic?<br />By the way I noticed that a bunch of so-called "czars" on your friends list are Senate confirmation positions, such as the Director of National Intelligence, the TARP Congressional Oversight Panel, the Deputy National Security Advisor, the Deputy Secretary of the Interior .... (I gave up counting when it became clear that the entire blog post was bunk.) Is it a threat to the Constitution to a Senate-confirmation postion?nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-15888578281065949502009-08-30T13:11:59.208-07:002009-08-30T13:11:59.208-07:00Nyp,
Why do you need my full name? I NEVER ask...Nyp, <br /> Why do you need my full name? I NEVER asked you for your full name as that would be quite intrusive, like you are being now. I merely requested a name instead of you hiding behind the opaque name anonymous. And, YES YOU DID MISS WITH THOSE TWO EYES OF YOURS THAT IN EVERY SINGLE COMMENT OF MINE IT HAS MY NAME TERESA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br /><br />Therefore, your eyesight must be close to reaching the near blind state.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-67183747619453098402009-08-30T13:03:58.240-07:002009-08-30T13:03:58.240-07:00Teresa - you write (with your customary charm) &qu...Teresa - you write (with your customary charm) "My name like I said before was in front of you the whole time. Please take a look with those things on the front of your face that allows you to see, called eyes." Unfortunately, it was not there when you and I had the relevant exchange of posts. As you acknowledged in your post of August 29 at 6:34 p.m.: "My full name is there now. It should have been there before." So it looks as if for at least one of us those things in front of our face that allow us to see are working just fine.nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-22004448885245223752009-08-30T12:48:05.674-07:002009-08-30T12:48:05.674-07:00Subvet,
Thanks for stopping by my blog and comme...Subvet,<br /> Thanks for stopping by my blog and commenting. I think you are right. No, the poster has been widely viewed due to the controversy. I think the cop acted "stupidly."Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-59007799248289743062009-08-30T12:44:28.233-07:002009-08-30T12:44:28.233-07:00nyp,
My name like I said before was in front of y...nyp,<br /> My name like I said before was in front of you the whole time. Please take a look with those things on the front of your face that allows you to see, called eyes. My name is clearly on all my postings and also clearly is written in big bold letters on my profile. Please, for God's sake wake up and smell the coffee and use the eyes that God gave you.<br /><br />None of the persons you mentioned are czars. In fact,Most if not all of those people you mentioned went through confirmation hearings. I will send you over to a fellow blogger friend's site that has a great deal of information on the Czars. Here's the link:http://mainfo.blogspot.com/2009/08/czarist-insanity-in-america-part-2-bill.html<br /><br />I actually looked that up and comparing Bush with Hitler was more prevalent than you might think. Not just the far left kooks who made these accusations.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-28716044824850102772009-08-30T12:35:13.328-07:002009-08-30T12:35:13.328-07:00The true irony is the cop's actions have ensur...The true irony is the cop's actions have ensured thousands more will see that sign than if he had just bit his lip and chalked it up to someone exercising their freedom of speech. <br /><br />Stupid is as stupid does.Subvethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13523683273450353313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-9029331806760690482009-08-30T12:23:54.533-07:002009-08-30T12:23:54.533-07:001. You know, I asked the author of this blog for ...1. You know, I asked the author of this blog for her full name because her vitriolic response to my first post accused me of being "gutless" for not identifying myself by name. I don't know hou you feel about it, but I thought it kind of odd that someone who called her commentator a "scared little puppy dog" would herself not identify herself by her first name. <br />2. Kind of interesting, isn't it, that no one can explain what this "czar" nuttiness is all about.<br />3. Gregori: I don't address you as "reverent" because I have no evidence that you are actually an ordained priest or minister. In fact, I find it difficult to believe that anyone who writes in the manner you do could actually be a representative oa any of the great religions. As for the quality of the current Administration, when I look at the President's chief advisors I see the former President of Harvard (Summers), the most recent Bush Secretary of Defense (Gates), the former first lady of the United States and Senator (Clinton), the former director of CBO (Orzag), the former chair of the UCBerkely Economics Department (Romer), the former Chier of Staff to the President (Panetta), a Nobel prize-winner in physics (Chu). Strikes me as a group that represents pretty much the best of what America has to offer. <br />Finally, does anyone care to anser my query about identifying all the writers, radio hosts, elected representatives, etc. who trafficked in vile Hitler/Nazi comparisons during the Bush administration? I seem to be having a mental block about it.nyphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858386005981382367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1075932024272546688.post-15676732094831822982009-08-30T11:37:38.763-07:002009-08-30T11:37:38.763-07:00Most Rev. Gregori,
Happy Sunday!!! You provi...Most Rev. Gregori,<br /> Happy Sunday!!! You provided a great explanation of who surround Obama and why they are of the extreme.Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.com